What describes an immaterial breach of contract?

An immaterial breach of contract refers to a situation where a party fails to perform a duty under the contract, but the breach is not significant enough to justify terminating the contract. This kind of breach typically causes only minor inconveniences or disruptions and does not affect the overall purpose of the agreement. As a result, the non-breaching party may still receive most of the benefits of the contract, and the breach may often be remedied through compensation or other means instead of ending the contract altogether.

In the context of the other choices, a serious violation that leads to termination indicates a material breach, which is far more severe and impacts the contract's execution profoundly. An incomplete contract does not pertain to the concept of a breach but rather deals with the validity and enforceability of the agreement itself. Lastly, while a breach that is always forgiven might imply leniency, it does not accurately describe immaterial breaches since not all such breaches are necessarily forgiven; their outcomes depend on the context and specific details of the case. Hence, option B accurately captures the nature of an immaterial breach.